
Object 265T
World of Tanks EU statistics for the IX USSR heavy tank Object 265T.
Object 265T characteristics
Firepower
- Damage
- 390hp
- … vs modules
- 165hp
- Penetration
- 242mm
- … at 500m
- 229mm
- DPM
- 4,129
- Reload
- 11.00s
- … intra-clip
- 3.00s
- Clip size
- 3
- … clip damage
- 1,170hp
- Rate of fire
- 10.59/min
- Aim time
- 2.70s
- Dispersion
- 0.420m
- … moving
- 0.240
- … hull traverse
- 0.240
- … turret traverse
- 0.150
- … after firing
- 4.00×
- … gun damaged
- 2.00×
- Shell velocity
- 950m/s
- Max range
- 720m
- Caliber
- 122mm
- Ammo capacity
- 50
- … potential damage
- 19,500hp
- Shell cost
- 870
- … full ammo
- 43,500
- Gun depression
- 20°
- Gun elevation
- 6°
- Gun traverse range
- 360°
Mobility
- Top speed
- 40km/h
- Reverse speed
- 14km/h
- Engine power
- 750hp
- Power/weight
- 14.2hp/t
- Hull traverse
- 30.0°/s
- Turret traverse
- 25.0°/s
- … hard
- 1.30
- … medium
- 1.50
- … soft
- 2.50
- … hard
- 39.8km/h
- … medium
- 34.5km/h
- … soft
- 20.7km/h
- … hard
- 30.0°/s
- … medium
- 26.0°/s
- … soft
- 15.6°/s
Survivability
- Hit points
- 1,800hp
- … front
- 130mm
- … side
- 75mm
- … rear
- 40mm
- … front
- 300mm
- … side
- 120mm
- … rear
- 40mm
- Track armor
- 20mm
- Fire chance
- 15.0%
- Track repair time
- 11.70s
- … ammo rack
- 230 / 173hp
- … track
- 240 / 180hp
- … engine
- 310 / 155hp
- … fuel tank
- 175 / 70hp
- … turret ring
- 170 / 85hp
- … viewport
- 110 / 55hp
Spotting & other
- View range
- 380m
- Signal range
- 730m
- … stationary
- 6.7%
- … moving
- 3.4%
- Weight
- 53.0t
Ammunition
Equipment
Consumables
Directives
Field Modifications
Crew Skills
Object 265T modules
Object 265T historical reference
A project for a heavy tank adapted for use with individual floating equipment. Developed in the second half of the 1950s on the initiative of the Mobile Vehicle Engineering Institute (VNII-100). Following detailed development, it was given the designation Object 265 and was presented for the approval of the Commander of Armored and Mechanized Forces of the Soviet Army. Despite great attention to unconventional layouts, including placing the engine-transmission compartment at the front, the military no longer considered the tank's development as promising. In addition, the degree of novelty in the new tank's control systems, with the driver being located in the turret, put off the potential client. The project was closed in order to work on enhancing the T-10 tank (Object 730).





