Medium tankPremiumARMT
World of Tanks EU statistics for the V USA medium tank ARMT.
ARMT characteristics
Firepower
- Damage
- 115hp
- … vs modules
- 105hp
- Penetration
- 128mm
- … at 500m
- 110mm
- DPM
- +1863
- Reload
- 19.00s
- … intra-clip
- 2.50s
- Clip size
- 3
- … clip damage
- 345hp
- Rate of fire
- 7.50/min
- Aim time
- 2.10s
- Dispersion
- 0.420m
- … moving
- 0.230
- … hull traverse
- 0.230
- … turret traverse
- 0.150
- … after firing
- 3.00×
- … gun damaged
- 2.00×
- Shell velocity
- 900m/s
- Max range
- 720m
- Caliber
- 76mm
- Ammo capacity
- 105
- … potential damage
- 12,075hp
- Shell cost
- 56
- … full ammo
- 5,880
- Gun depression
- 60°
- Gun elevation
- 15°
- Gun traverse range
- 360°
Mobility
- Top speed
- 45km/h
- Reverse speed
- 18km/h
- Engine power
- 550hp
- Power/weight
- 16.2hp/t
- Hull traverse
- 40.0°/s
- Turret traverse
- 39.0°/s
- … hard
- 1.00
- … medium
- 1.10
- … soft
- 1.90
- … hard
- 45.0km/h
- … medium
- 45.0km/h
- … soft
- 31.1km/h
- … hard
- 40.0°/s
- … medium
- 36.4°/s
- … soft
- 21.1°/s
Survivability
- Hit points
- 600hp
- … front
- 51mm
- … side
- 51mm
- … rear
- 25mm
- … front
- 76mm
- … side
- 51mm
- … rear
- 25mm
- Track armor
- 20mm
- Fire chance
- 20.0%
- Track repair time
- 12.03s
- … ammo rack
- 180 / 120hp
- … track
- 110 / 85hp
- … engine
- 247 / 123hp
- … fuel tank
- 150 / 50hp
- … turret ring
- 100 / 50hp
- … viewport
- 80 / 40hp
Spotting & other
- View range
- 370m
- Signal range
- 410m
- … stationary
- 10.3%
- … moving
- 7.7%
- Weight
- 34.0t
Ammunition
Equipment
Consumables
Directives
Crew Skills
Commander / Radio Operator
Gunner / Loader
DriverARMT modules
ARMT historical reference
The development of the ARMT tank was based on the creation of an automated loading mechanism that would provide a rate of fire previously considered unattainable. This was made possible by the autoreloader, which delivered quick-firing rounds driven by a planetary gear mechanism and an electric motor. The innovative turret design allowed the gun to fire at an elevation of about 60 degrees and a tilt angle of about -15 degrees. The removal of the loader from the crew was also a tempting idea. In addition to the high complexity of production and the difficulties in maintaining the autoreloader, the tank was notable for its height and vulnerability. Its 75–76 mm gun was obsolete for fighting advanced Soviet tanks. At the same time, attempts to mount a 90 mm gun would have resulted in a significant increase in weight and a complete revision of the design, which was ultimately never built.