players online
Support us
Object 268 Version V
XUSSRTank destroyerVersatileReward

Object 268 Version V

World of Tanks EU statistics for the X USSR tank destroyer Object 268 Version V.

Object 268 Version V characteristics

Firepower

Damage
750hp
… vs modules
203hp
Penetration
303mm
… at 500m
293mm
DPM
2,296
Reload
19.60s
Rate of fire
3.06/min
Aim time
3.00s
Dispersion
0.360m
… moving
0.220
… hull traverse
0.220
… turret traverse
0.200
… after firing
4.00×
… gun damaged
2.00×
Shell velocity
950m/s
Max range
720m
Caliber
152mm
Ammo capacity
30
… potential damage
22,500hp
Shell cost
1,650
… full ammo
49,500
Gun depression
15°
Gun elevation
5°
Gun traverse range
360°

Mobility

Top speed
48km/h
Reverse speed
15km/h
Engine power
750hp
Power/weight
15.0hp/t
Hull traverse
20.0°/s
Turret traverse
18.0°/s
Terrain resistance
… hard
1.80
… medium
2.00
… soft
2.60
Effective speed
… hard
30.5km/h
… medium
27.4km/h
… soft
21.1km/h
Effective traverse
… hard
20.0°/s
… medium
18.0°/s
… soft
13.8°/s

Survivability

Hit points
2,000hp
Hull armor
… front
120mm
… side
90mm
… rear
40mm
Turret armor
… front
230mm
… side
90mm
… rear
60mm
Track armor
20mm
Fire chance
15.0%
Track repair time
12.03s
Module HP (max / repaired)
… ammo rack
210 / 140hp
… track
250 / 190hp
… engine
370 / 185hp
… fuel tank
200 / 80hp
… turret ring
170 / 85hp
… viewport
120 / 60hp

Spotting & other

View range
360m
Signal range
720m
Camouflage
… stationary
15.4%
… moving
9.2%
Weight
50.0t

Ammunition

Equipment

Consumables

Directives

Field Modifications

Crew Skills

Crew level100%
Commander / Radio Operator
Driver
Gunner
Loader
Loader

Object 268 Version V modules

X152 mm M-53Stock
XObject 268 Version VStock
XV-12-6VStock
XObject 268 Version VStock
X10RK-26Stock
XObj. 268/5

Object 268 Version V historical reference

A tank destroyer based on the Object 730 (T-10) tank. Developed in the early 1950s. The project allowed a gun to be mounted in a rotating turret, enabling all-round horizontal fire. Most ammunition was placed in the rear of the turret in order to improve crew operating conditions. The project was cancelled, because expensive and complicated modifications of many basic components were required.