
XP cost270(~$0.61)
Credits cost3,000(~$0.59)
Total cost~$1.20
Free XP310(~$0.61)
RateXP = 1 gold
II
Light tank
Type 95 Ha-Go
World of Tanks NA statistics for the II JAPAN light tank Type 95 Ha-Go.
Type 95 Ha-Go tech tree branch
Type 95 Ha-Go characteristics
Firepower
- Damage
- 45hp
- … vs modules
- 50hp
- Penetration
- 48mm
- … at 500m
- 40mm
- DPM
- 1,174
- Reload
- 2.30s
- Rate of fire
- 26.09/min
- Aim time
- 1.70s
- Dispersion
- 0.440m
- … moving
- 0.260
- … hull traverse
- 0.260
- … turret traverse
- 0.120
- … after firing
- 3.00×
- … gun damaged
- 2.00×
- Shell velocity
- 685m/s
- Max range
- 720m
- Caliber
- 37mm
- … potential damage
- 10,800hp
- … full ammo
- 3,360
Mobility
- Top speed
- 40km/h
- Reverse speed
- 15km/h
- Engine power
- 135hp
- Power/weight
- 18.2hp/t
- Hull traverse
- 47.0°/s
- Turret traverse
- 36.0°/s
- … hard
- 0.80
- … medium
- 1.00
- … soft
- 1.90
- … hard
- 40.0km/h
- … medium
- 40.0km/h
- … soft
- 35.1km/h
- … hard
- 47.0°/s
- … medium
- 37.6°/s
- … soft
- 19.8°/s
Survivability
- Hit points
- 335hp
- … front
- 12mm
- … side
- 12mm
- … rear
- 10mm
- … front
- 12mm
- … side
- 12mm
- … rear
- 12mm
- Track armor
- 10mm
- Fire chance
- 15.0%
- Track repair time
- 12.03s
- … ammo rack
- 80 / 55hp
- … track
- 50 / 40hp
- … engine
- 66 / 33hp
- … fuel tank
- 100 / 40hp
- … turret ring
- 60 / 30hp
- … viewport
- 40 / 20hp
Spotting & other
- View range
- 300m
- Signal range
- 350m
- … stationary
- 15.2%
- … moving
- 11.4%
- Weight
- 7.4t
Ammunition
Equipment
Consumables
Directives
Crew Skills
Crew level100%
Type 95 Ha-Go modules
Type 95 Ha-Go historical reference
Japanese light tank also known as the Type 95. Developed from 1933 through 1935 as a cavalry support vehicle. However, the tank was often used to support infantry. The first prototype was built by Mitsubishi. The vehicle entered mass production in 1936, and a total of 2,378 vehicles were manufactured through 1943.
Type 95 Ha-Go videos
No videos yet
No community video for the Type 95 Ha-Go yet. Suggest one and it shows up here once a moderator has looked at it.





