
Cost8,800(~€31.77)
IX
Light tankWheeledPremium
VCS 6x6 TS 90
World of Tanks EU statistics for the IX FRANCE light tank VCS 6x6 TS 90.
VCS 6x6 TS 90 characteristics
Firepower
- Damage
- 250hp
- … vs modules
- 122hp
- Penetration
- 202mm
- … at 500m
- 188mm
- DPM
- 1,714
- Reload
- 16.00s
- … intra-clip
- 1.50s
- … clip damage
- 500hp
- Rate of fire
- 6.86/min
- Aim time
- 1.80s
- Dispersion
- 0.400m
- … moving
- 0.100
- … hull traverse
- 0.100
- … turret traverse
- 0.080
- … after firing
- 3.00×
- … gun damaged
- 2.00×
- Shell velocity
- 980m/s
- Max range
- 720m
- Caliber
- 90mm
- … potential damage
- 12,500hp
- Shell cost
- 466
- … full ammo
- 23,300
Mobility
- Top speed
- 80km/h
- Reverse speed
- 40km/h
- Engine power
- 580hp
- Power/weight
- 42.6hp/t
- Hull traverse
- 40.0°/s
- Turret traverse
- 50.0°/s
- … hard
- 1.00
- … medium
- 1.35
- … soft
- 1.95
- … hard
- 80.0km/h
- … medium
- 80.0km/h
- … soft
- 80.0km/h
- … hard
- 40.0°/s
- … medium
- 29.6°/s
- … soft
- 20.5°/s
Survivability
- Hit points
- 1,350hp
- … front
- 13mm
- … side
- 8mm
- … rear
- 8mm
- … front
- 13mm
- … side
- 8mm
- … rear
- 8mm
- Fire chance
- 15.0%
- Track repair time
- 29.24s
- … ammo rack
- 230 / 173hp
- … track
- 240 / 180hp
- … engine
- 310 / 155hp
- … fuel tank
- 200 / 70hp
- … turret ring
- 170 / 85hp
- … viewport
- 110 / 55hp
Spotting & other
- View range
- 380m
- Signal range
- 670m
- … stationary
- 14.5%
- … moving
- 14.5%
- Weight
- 13.6t
Ammunition
Equipment
Consumables
Directives
Field Modifications
Crew Skills
Crew level100%
VCS 6x6 TS 90 modules
VCS 6x6 TS 90 historical reference
The VCS 6x6 TS 90 was developed for export as a recon vehicle that could engage in combat with tanks. The design was harmonized as much as possible with the Renault VAB armored personnel carrier. The vehicle was presented to the press in June 1976; however, it never entered mass production. The project led to the development of the VBC-90.
VCS 6x6 TS 90 videos
No videos yet
No community video for the VCS 6x6 TS 90 yet. Suggest one and it shows up here once a moderator has looked at it.





