
I
Light tank
Renault Otsu
World of Tanks EU statistics for the I JAPAN light tank Renault Otsu.
Renault Otsu tech tree branch
Renault Otsu characteristics
Firepower
- Damage
- 8hp
- … vs modules
- 18hp
- Penetration
- 33mm
- … at 500m
- 25mm
- DPM
- 939
- Reload
- 5.80s
- … intra-clip
- 0.13s
- … clip damage
- 120hp
- Rate of fire
- 117.39/min
- Aim time
- 2.00s
- Dispersion
- 0.480m
- … moving
- 0.360
- … hull traverse
- 0.360
- … turret traverse
- 0.140
- … after firing
- 1.20×
- … gun damaged
- 2.00×
- Shell velocity
- 800m/s
- Max range
- 400m
- Caliber
- 13mm
- Ammo capacity
- 1,665
- … potential damage
- 13,320hp
Mobility
- Top speed
- 23km/h
- Reverse speed
- 8km/h
- Engine power
- 100hp
- Power/weight
- 11.9hp/t
- Hull traverse
- 40.0°/s
- Turret traverse
- 24.0°/s
- … hard
- 1.10
- … medium
- 1.30
- … soft
- 2.50
- … hard
- 23.0km/h
- … medium
- 23.0km/h
- … soft
- 17.4km/h
- … hard
- 40.0°/s
- … medium
- 33.8°/s
- … soft
- 17.6°/s
Survivability
- Hit points
- 240hp
- … front
- 30mm
- … side
- 30mm
- … rear
- 22mm
- … front
- 20mm
- … side
- 20mm
- … rear
- 20mm
- Track armor
- 5mm
- Fire chance
- 15.0%
- Track repair time
- 6.00s
- … ammo rack
- 65 / 45hp
- … track
- 50 / 40hp
- … engine
- 44 / 22hp
- … fuel tank
- 100 / 40hp
- … turret ring
- 50 / 25hp
- … viewport
- 30 / 15hp
Spotting & other
- View range
- 280m
- Signal range
- 300m
- … stationary
- 14.0%
- … moving
- 10.5%
- Weight
- 8.4t
Ammunition
Equipment
Consumables
Directives
Crew Skills
Crew level100%
Renault Otsu modules
Renault Otsu historical reference
Developed from 1925 through 1928 in France as an upgraded modification of the Renault FT. The modernization project was finished and the vehicle saw mass production. In 1929, a total of 10 vehicles were purchased by Japan and were designated the Otsu-Gata Sensha (Tank B Model). The Japanese vehicles were slightly modernized and were widely used both in action and for training purposes.
Renault Otsu videos
No videos yet
No community video for the Renault Otsu yet. Suggest one and it shows up here once a moderator has looked at it.





