
IX
Heavy tankAssaultReward
TT-130M
World of Tanks NA statistics for the IX CZECH heavy tank TT-130M.
TT-130M characteristics
Firepower
- Damage
- 490hp
- … vs modules
- 180hp
- Penetration
- 244mm
- … at 500m
- 225mm
- DPM
- 2,000
- Reload
- 14.70s
- Rate of fire
- 4.08/min
- Aim time
- 2.70s
- Dispersion
- 0.400m
- … moving
- 0.250
- … hull traverse
- 0.250
- … turret traverse
- 0.150
- … after firing
- 3.50×
- … gun damaged
- 2.00×
- Shell velocity
- 980m/s
- Max range
- 720m
- Caliber
- 130mm
- … potential damage
- 19,600hp
- Shell cost
- 1,100
- … full ammo
- 44,000
Mobility
- Top speed
- 30km/h
- Reverse speed
- 14km/h
- Engine power
- 600hp
- Power/weight
- 10.9hp/t
- Hull traverse
- 25.0°/s
- Turret traverse
- 25.0°/s
- … hard
- 1.30
- … medium
- 1.40
- … soft
- 2.30
- … hard
- 30.0km/h
- … medium
- 28.5km/h
- … soft
- 17.3km/h
- … hard
- 25.0°/s
- … medium
- 23.2°/s
- … soft
- 14.1°/s
Survivability
- Hit points
- 1,850hp
- … front
- 100mm
- … side
- 70mm
- … rear
- 70mm
- … front
- 300mm
- … side
- 150mm
- … rear
- 90mm
- Track armor
- 30mm
- Fire chance
- 15.0%
- Track repair time
- 12.03s
- … ammo rack
- 260 / 180hp
- … track
- 250 / 190hp
- … engine
- 370 / 185hp
- … fuel tank
- 200 / 80hp
- … turret ring
- 150 / 75hp
- … viewport
- 110 / 55hp
Spotting & other
- View range
- 380m
- Signal range
- 850m
- … stationary
- 7.0%
- … moving
- 3.5%
- Weight
- 55.0t
Ammunition
Equipment
Consumables
Directives
Field Modifications
Crew Skills
Crew level100%
TT-130M modules
TT-130M historical reference
One of the deep modernizations of the T-56 heavy tank. The tank design was to involve innovative solutions aimed at increasing the vehicle's survivability and crossing capacity. The vehicle was supposed to incorporate equivalents of Soviet and Chinese designs, information about which was obtained from various sources. However, the vehicle project was canceled due to the development of a separate main battle tank class.
TT-130M videos
No videos yet
No community video for the TT-130M yet. Suggest one and it shows up here once a moderator has looked at it.





