
Credits cost32,400(~$0.95)
III
Tank destroyer
M3G FT
World of Tanks NA statistics for the III CHINA tank destroyer M3G FT.
M3G FT characteristics
Firepower
- Damage
- 85hp
- … vs modules
- 76hp
- Penetration
- 112mm
- … at 500m
- 98mm
- DPM
- 1,545
- Reload
- 3.30s
- Rate of fire
- 18.18/min
- Aim time
- 2.30s
- Dispersion
- 0.420m
- … moving
- 0.300
- … hull traverse
- 0.300
- … turret traverse
- 0.120
- … after firing
- 4.00×
- … gun damaged
- 2.00×
- Shell velocity
- 990m/s
- Max range
- 720m
- Caliber
- 57mm
- … potential damage
- 7,650hp
- … full ammo
- 5,040
Mobility
- Top speed
- 55km/h
- Reverse speed
- 12km/h
- Engine power
- 280hp
- Power/weight
- 21.9hp/t
- Hull traverse
- 36.0°/s
- Turret traverse
- 40.0°/s
- … hard
- 1.80
- … medium
- 2.10
- … soft
- 2.90
- … hard
- 44.4km/h
- … medium
- 38.1km/h
- … soft
- 27.6km/h
- … hard
- 36.0°/s
- … medium
- 30.9°/s
- … soft
- 22.3°/s
Survivability
- Hit points
- 285hp
- … front
- 25mm
- … side
- 25mm
- … rear
- 25mm
- … front
- 9mm
- … side
- 9mm
- … rear
- 9mm
- Track armor
- 10mm
- Fire chance
- 20.0%
- Track repair time
- 10.03s
- … ammo rack
- 110 / 70hp
- … track
- 60 / 45hp
- … engine
- 58 / 32hp
- … fuel tank
- 125 / 50hp
- … turret ring
- 70 / 35hp
- … viewport
- 50 / 25hp
Spotting & other
- View range
- 310m
- Signal range
- 325m
- … stationary
- 17.8%
- … moving
- 10.7%
- Weight
- 12.8t
Ammunition
Equipment
Consumables
Directives
Crew Skills
Crew level100%
M3G FT modules
M3G FT historical reference
In 1943, the National Revolutionary Army of Kuomintang received 48 light M3A3 and M5A1 tanks under the USA Lend-Lease program. Some vehicles were captured by the People's Liberation Army. Following the end of the civil war, it was decided to improve the firepower of these tanks. It was planned to mount the Soviet anti-tank guns; however, since the export of the Soviet T-34-85 tanks had begun, the issue of modernization became outdated. No prototypes were built.
M3G FT videos
No videos yet
No community video for the M3G FT yet. Suggest one and it shows up here once a moderator has looked at it.




