
Cost6,000(~€22.29)
VII
Tank destroyerVersatilePremium
SU-122-44
World of Tanks EU statistics for the VII USSR tank destroyer SU-122-44.
SU-122-44 characteristics
Firepower
- Damage
- 390hp
- … vs modules
- 165hp
- Penetration
- 175mm
- … at 500m
- 152mm
- DPM
- 2,925
- Reload
- 8.00s
- Rate of fire
- 7.50/min
- Aim time
- 2.90s
- Dispersion
- 0.410m
- … moving
- 0.210
- … hull traverse
- 0.210
- … turret traverse
- 0.120
- … after firing
- 3.00×
- … gun damaged
- 2.00×
- Shell velocity
- 800m/s
- Max range
- 720m
- Caliber
- 122mm
- … potential damage
- 13,650hp
- Shell cost
- 1,025
- … full ammo
- 35,875
Mobility
- Top speed
- 48km/h
- Reverse speed
- 13km/h
- Engine power
- 500hp
- Power/weight
- 15.2hp/t
- Hull traverse
- 42.0°/s
- Turret traverse
- 26.0°/s
- … hard
- 1.00
- … medium
- 1.20
- … soft
- 2.00
- … hard
- 47.5km/h
- … medium
- 46.5km/h
- … soft
- 27.9km/h
- … hard
- 42.0°/s
- … medium
- 35.0°/s
- … soft
- 21.0°/s
Survivability
- Hit points
- 840hp
- … front
- 90mm
- … side
- 75mm
- … rear
- 45mm
- Track armor
- 20mm
- Fire chance
- 15.0%
- Track repair time
- 10.03s
- … ammo rack
- 180 / 120hp
- … track
- 180 / 135hp
- … engine
- 145 / 72hp
- … fuel tank
- 175 / 70hp
- … turret ring
- 100 / 50hp
- … viewport
- 100 / 50hp
Spotting & other
- View range
- 330m
- Signal range
- 700m
- … stationary
- 21.5%
- … moving
- 12.9%
- Weight
- 32.8t
Ammunition
Equipment
Consumables
Directives
Field Modifications
Crew Skills
Crew level100%
SU-122-44 modules
SU-122-44 historical reference
Development was started in June 1944 by the Uralmash Design Bureau. The vehicle was based on the T-44 chassis and had a conventional configuration, with the front placement of the fighting compartment. In October, People's Commissariat of the Tank Industry considered the SU-122-44 project. In December the design project was ready. However, the SU-100M-2 with the rear placement of the fighting compartment was preferred.
SU-122-44 videos
No videos yet
No community video for the SU-122-44 yet. Suggest one and it shows up here once a moderator has looked at it.




