
XP cost239,000(~SGD 53.95)
Credits cost6,100,000(~SGD 84.62)
Total cost~SGD 138.57
Free XP765,785(~SGD 166.63)
RateXP = 1 gold
X
Tank destroyerVersatile
Object 268
World of Tanks ASIA statistics for the X USSR tank destroyer Object 268.
Object 268 tech tree branch
Object 268 characteristics
Firepower
- Damage
- 750hp
- … vs modules
- 203hp
- Penetration
- 303mm
- … at 500m
- 293mm
- DPM
- 2,727
- Reload
- 16.50s
- Rate of fire
- 3.64/min
- Aim time
- 2.50s
- Dispersion
- 0.330m
- … moving
- 0.180
- … hull traverse
- 0.180
- … turret traverse
- 0.080
- … after firing
- 4.00×
- … gun damaged
- 2.00×
- Shell velocity
- 950m/s
- Max range
- 720m
- Caliber
- 152mm
- … potential damage
- 26,250hp
- Shell cost
- 1,650
- … full ammo
- 57,750
Mobility
- Top speed
- 48km/h
- Reverse speed
- 15km/h
- Engine power
- 950hp
- Power/weight
- 18.6hp/t
- Hull traverse
- 33.0°/s
- Turret traverse
- 26.0°/s
- … hard
- 1.10
- … medium
- 1.30
- … soft
- 2.00
- … hard
- 48.0km/h
- … medium
- 48.0km/h
- … soft
- 34.1km/h
- … hard
- 33.0°/s
- … medium
- 27.9°/s
- … soft
- 18.2°/s
Survivability
- Hit points
- 1,950hp
- … front
- 187mm
- … side
- 100mm
- … rear
- 50mm
- Track armor
- 20mm
- Fire chance
- 12.0%
- Track repair time
- 11.79s
- … ammo rack
- 210 / 140hp
- … track
- 250 / 188hp
- … engine
- 345 / 173hp
- … fuel tank
- 200 / 80hp
- … turret ring
- 185 / 93hp
- … viewport
- 120 / 60hp
Spotting & other
- View range
- 370m
- Signal range
- 730m
- … stationary
- 16.4%
- … moving
- 9.8%
- Weight
- 51.0t
Ammunition
Equipment
Consumables
Directives
Field Modifications
Crew Skills
Crew level100%
Object 268 modules
Object 268 historical reference
Development of the Object 268 was started in the summer of 1952 at the Kirov Plant, Leningrad, under the supervision of Joseph Kotin. The vehicle was developed on the basis of the T-10 heavy tank. A prototype was manufactured in 1956. The vehicle passed trials, but never saw mass production.
Object 268 videos
No videos yet
No community video for the Object 268 yet. Suggest one and it shows up here once a moderator has looked at it.




