
XP cost110,000(~SGD 25.51)
Credits cost2,520,000(~SGD 36.08)
Total cost~SGD 61.59
Free XP254,725(~SGD 57.37)
RateXP = 1 gold
VIII
Heavy tankVersatile
Caernarvon
World of Tanks ASIA statistics for the VIII UK heavy tank Caernarvon.
Caernarvon tech tree branch
Caernarvon characteristics
Firepower
- Damage
- 150hp
- … vs modules
- 105hp
- Penetration
- 197mm
- … at 500m
- 185mm
- DPM
- 2,647
- Reload
- 3.40s
- Rate of fire
- 17.65/min
- Aim time
- 2.10s
- Dispersion
- 0.340m
- … moving
- 0.160
- … hull traverse
- 0.160
- … turret traverse
- 0.100
- … after firing
- 3.00×
- … gun damaged
- 2.00×
- Shell velocity
- 884m/s
- Max range
- 720m
- Caliber
- 76mm
- … potential damage
- 10,500hp
- Shell cost
- 175
- … full ammo
- 12,250
Mobility
- Top speed
- 34km/h
- Reverse speed
- 12km/h
- Engine power
- 830hp
- Power/weight
- 14.0hp/t
- Hull traverse
- 26.0°/s
- Turret traverse
- 30.0°/s
- … hard
- 1.10
- … medium
- 1.30
- … soft
- 2.30
- … hard
- 34.3km/h
- … medium
- 34.3km/h
- … soft
- 22.3km/h
- … hard
- 26.0°/s
- … medium
- 22.0°/s
- … soft
- 12.4°/s
Survivability
- Hit points
- 1,660hp
- … front
- 130mm
- … side
- 76mm
- … rear
- 38mm
- … front
- 152mm
- … side
- 89mm
- … rear
- 89mm
- Track armor
- 25mm
- Fire chance
- 20.0%
- Track repair time
- 12.03s
- … ammo rack
- 240 / 160hp
- … track
- 200 / 150hp
- … engine
- 320 / 160hp
- … fuel tank
- 200 / 70hp
- … turret ring
- 150 / 75hp
- … viewport
- 100 / 50hp
Spotting & other
- View range
- 390m
- Signal range
- 750m
- … stationary
- 4.6%
- … moving
- 2.3%
- Weight
- 59.2t
Ammunition
Equipment
Consumables
Directives
Field Modifications
Crew Skills
Crew level100%
Caernarvon modules
Caernarvon historical reference
Development of this infantry support tank started in 1944. The first prototype was ready for trials in 1952. A total of 21 tanks were manufactured but never entered service. Some of the vehicles were later converted into Conqueror heavy tanks.
Caernarvon videos
No videos yet
No community video for the Caernarvon yet. Suggest one and it shows up here once a moderator has looked at it.





