Avg WN7 Β· 30d
β
Avg WN8 Β· 30d
β
Avg WNX Β· 30d
β
Avg WN7
872
Avg WN8
1,085
Avg WNX
1,009
Avg winrate
48.2%
In the early 1950s, the four-track design became a popular idea in NATO countries, and it was this design that was attempted on the new TF-4 flamethrower tank. The tank was to feature very strong armor protection to effectively operate as a flamethrower vehicle, and a hydrostatic transmission to ensure high mobility. A poorly developed design concept meant that the TF-4 was not even included in the general list of Question Mark conference questions. As a result, the project was lost among others and never developed further.
[TF-4] stronghold stats
| Stat | Total | Last 24h | Last 7d | Last 30d |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELO T10 | 1,000 | 0 | β | β |
| Advances T10 | 0 | 0 | β | β |
| Advances T10 WR | β | β | β | β |
| Skirmish T10 | 0 | 0 | β | β |
| Skirmish T10 WR | β | β | β | β |
| ELO T8 | 1,000 | 0 | β | β |
| Skirmish T8 | 0 | 0 | β | β |
| Skirmish T8 WR | β | β | β | β |
| ELO T6 | 903 | 0 | β | β |
| Skirmish T6 | 11 | 0 | β | β |
| Skirmish T6 WR | 9.09% | β | β | β |
