Cost1,500(~€6.10)
V
Tank destroyerPremium
Tank destroyerPremiumSU-100I
World of Tanks EU statistics for the V USSR tank destroyer SU-100I.
SU-100I characteristics
Firepower
- Damage
- 250hp
- … vs modules
- 135hp
- Penetration
- 175mm
- … at 500m
- 162mm
- DPM
- 1,515
- Reload
- 9.90s
- Rate of fire
- 6.06/min
- Aim time
- 2.50s
- Dispersion
- 0.420m
- … moving
- 0.240
- … hull traverse
- 0.240
- … turret traverse
- 0.160
- … after firing
- 4.00×
- … gun damaged
- 2.00×
- Shell velocity
- 900m/s
- Max range
- 720m
- Caliber
- 100mm
- Ammo capacity
- 30
- … potential damage
- 7,500hp
- Shell cost
- 284
- … full ammo
- 8,520
- Gun depression
- 20°
- Gun elevation
- 6°
- Gun traverse range
- 24°
Mobility
- Top speed
- 45km/h
- Reverse speed
- 12km/h
- Engine power
- 470hp
- Power/weight
- 15.7hp/t
- Hull traverse
- 32.0°/s
- Turret traverse
- 30.0°/s
- … hard
- 1.10
- … medium
- 1.40
- … soft
- 2.10
- … hard
- 45.0km/h
- … medium
- 40.9km/h
- … soft
- 27.3km/h
- … hard
- 32.0°/s
- … medium
- 25.1°/s
- … soft
- 16.8°/s
Terrain resistance
Effective speed
Effective traverse
Survivability
- Hit points
- 500hp
- … front
- 51mm
- … side
- 38mm
- … rear
- 38mm
- Track armor
- 20mm
- Fire chance
- 15.0%
- Track repair time
- 12.03s
- … ammo rack
- 130 / 85hp
- … track
- 100 / 75hp
- … engine
- 176 / 100hp
- … fuel tank
- 150 / 60hp
- … turret ring
- 100 / 50hp
- … viewport
- 70 / 35hp
Hull armor
Module HP (max / repaired)
Spotting & other
- View range
- 340m
- Signal range
- 525m
- … stationary
- 20.4%
- … moving
- 12.3%
- Weight
- 30.0t
Camouflage
Ammunition
Equipment
Consumables
Directives
Crew Skills
Crew level100%
Commander / Radio Operator
Gunner
Driver
LoaderSU-100I modules
VII100 mm S-34IStock
VGMC 6046IStock
VSU-100IStock
VISCR 508IStock
VSU-100I
SU-100I historical reference
The Soviet Central Artillery Design Bureau was working in several areas simultaneously, one of which was an initiative of A. S. Chasovnikov to reequip foreign vehicles. A number of reequipment options were proposed for the American M4A2, including repurposing it as an SPG. The project was considered in February 1944 but was not adopted, primarily because there was no requirement for modernization.