
Cost1,400(~€5.72)
V
Light tankPremium
M24 Chaffee No. 594
World of Tanks EU statistics for the V USA light tank M24 Chaffee No. 594.
M24 Chaffee No. 594 characteristics
Firepower
- Damage
- 110hp
- … vs modules
- 100hp
- Penetration
- 118mm
- … at 500m
- 103mm
- DPM
- 1,610
- Reload
- 4.10s
- Rate of fire
- 14.63/min
- Aim time
- 1.50s
- Dispersion
- 0.380m
- … moving
- 0.130
- … hull traverse
- 0.130
- … turret traverse
- 0.080
- … after firing
- 3.50×
- … gun damaged
- 2.00×
- Shell velocity
- 619m/s
- Max range
- 720m
- Caliber
- 75mm
- Ammo capacity
- 60
- … potential damage
- 6,600hp
- Shell cost
- 56
- … full ammo
- 3,360
- Gun depression
- 15°
- Gun elevation
- 10°
- Gun traverse range
- 360°
Mobility
- Top speed
- 56km/h
- Reverse speed
- 20km/h
- Engine power
- 350hp
- Power/weight
- 18.4hp/t
- Hull traverse
- 50.0°/s
- Turret traverse
- 44.0°/s
- … hard
- 0.80
- … medium
- 1.00
- … soft
- 1.70
- … hard
- 56.0km/h
- … medium
- 56.0km/h
- … soft
- 39.6km/h
- … hard
- 50.0°/s
- … medium
- 40.0°/s
- … soft
- 23.5°/s
Terrain resistance
Effective speed
Effective traverse
Survivability
- Hit points
- 550hp
- … front
- 25mm
- … side
- 25mm
- … rear
- 19mm
- … front
- 38mm
- … side
- 25mm
- … rear
- 25mm
- Track armor
- 20mm
- Fire chance
- 20.0%
- Track repair time
- 12.03s
- … ammo rack
- 170 / 120hp
- … track
- 100 / 75hp
- … engine
- 123 / 58hp
- … fuel tank
- 150 / 50hp
- … turret ring
- 100 / 50hp
- … viewport
- 70 / 35hp
Hull armor
Turret armor
Module HP (max / repaired)
Spotting & other
- View range
- 360m
- Signal range
- 570m
- … stationary
- 15.7%
- … moving
- 15.7%
- Weight
- 19.0t
Camouflage
Ammunition
Equipment
Consumables
Directives
Crew Skills
Crew level100%
M24 Chaffee No. 594 modules
M24 Chaffee No. 594 historical reference
One of the American projects in 1946 was testing of the M24 Chaffee with the suspension from the German Sd.Kfz. 8. Its chassis with staggered wheel arrangement and tracks with needle bearings had excellent movement characteristics and was of great interest to researchers. Testing on solid terrain yielded satisfactory results, which could not be said about soft terrain. In general, there were no obvious advantages of using this suspension compared to the standard M24 Chaffee suspension. Testing was stopped and the project was terminated.





